Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena" Results 361 - 380 of 1,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Staten Island Family Lawyer said the CPLR 2304 provides: A motion to quash, fix conditions or modify a subpoena shall be made promptly in the court in which the subpoena is returnable. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
The judge went on to note, as a preface, that Uberhas demonstrated the following: (1) John Doe I is a real person who may be sued in federal court; (2) it has unsuccessfully attempted to identify John Doe I before filing this motion; (3) its claims against John Doe I could withstand a motion to dismiss; and (4) there is a reasonable likelihood that the proposed subpoena will lead to information identifying John Doe I.Uber Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm by Doug Austin
: eDiscovery Best PracticesOrganizations are Increasing Their Investment in Legal Data Analytics, According to New Survey: eDiscovery TrendsPlaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena of Text Messages Granted by Court: eDiscovery Case Law  [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm by Doug Austin
Allan Alexander granted the plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena where the defendant subpoenaed the plaintiff’s text messages and call log records from his mobile provider. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, the Orders of the Supreme Court, New York County, both respectively entered March 1, 1977, granting movants'-respondents' motions to quash the Grand Jury subpoenas duces tecum, should be reversed, on the law, without costs and disbursements, and the motions should be denied. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:21 pm by Michael Kline
The Group apparently did not alert the plaintiff of the subpoena, file a motion to quash it or appear in court, but rather mailed a copy of the plaintiff’s medical file to the court. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 10:13 am by Erin E. Dardis
” The court quashed the trial court order denying the motion for protective order and certified the above-referenced questions to the Florida Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Court Denies Plaintiff’s Fallback Request for Meet and Confer after Quashing its Subpoena: In Boston Scientific Corporation v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm by Katherine Gallo
Sweeney and his counsel had no idea about that there was correspondence for a period of almost three weeks regarding how this could be addressed and that there was no need to have this Motion to Quash the subpoena. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:37 am by azatty
I understand that in the hands-on advocacy training, participants in small groups will focus on media-law problems and will: Argue a motion to quash a subpoena to a blogger in a civil case based on the First Amendment Argue a summary judgment motion involving an invasion of privacy claim based on a leaked sex video and a defamation claim based on comments by an anonymous blog poster Review a television story and related social media promotions based on public… [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:45 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
According to the Supreme Court’s decision, the provider “did not alert the plaintiff of the subpoena, file a motion to quash it or appear in court. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
 The trial court denied Sallie Mae’s motion to quash, holding that the information was relevant and should be produced. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
 The trial court denied Sallie Mae’s motion to quash, holding that the information was relevant and should be produced. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:18 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Leinenweber denied Doe 39′s motion to quash a pre-discovery subpoena in this BitTorrent case involving the motion picture “Under the Bed. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:56 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterEvan Brown reports: A trial court in Arizona has quashed a subpoena served on Godaddy, issued by a plaintiff in a defamation suit against an anonymous website owner. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:01 am
Brody contends that the court improperly denied her motions for a protective order and to quash that subpoena because it lacked authority to allow such discovery without first substantiating the plaintiff’s allegations of fraud beyond mere suspicion in a court hearing, consistent with Oneglia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 2:32 am by Walter Olson
[KTRK, Houston Chronicle; text of subpoena request; motion to quash] The city has already backed off in part, saying it will narrow the demands to focus on the issue of whether the plaintiffs were aware of petition procedures. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
At the hearing on the motion to quash, the trial court noted that the whole matter would be better addressed within the context of Supreme Court Rule 224. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
As part of discovery in the lawsuit in state court, the city issued broad subpoenas (full text) to a group of five pastors calling for them to produce, among other items:All communications with members of your congregation regarding HERO [Houston Equal Rights Ordinance] or the Petition....All speeches, presentations, or sermons related to HERO, the Petition, Mayor Annise Parker, homosexuality, or gender identity prepared by, delivered by, revised by, or approved by you or in your… [read post]