Search for: "NAACP v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 3:14 pm
United States and Debs v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
See NAACP v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Eight-time relist Newton v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:13 am
The Supreme Court upheld their right to do so in NAACP v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 9:49 am
This is McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
(Disclosure: Akin Gump filed the amicus brief of the NAACP in support of the petitioner.) [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
” Fourteen other states have a similar rule. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
” Fourteen other states have a similar rule. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The United States Supreme Court released a 183 page opinion today in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
Known for his championing of individual rights while on the bench and for, previously, successfully arguing against school segregation for the NAACP in Brown v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
NAACP v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
South Carolina State Conf. of the NAACP (reversing a lower court judgment that had invalidated South Carolina's electoral map on the ground that it was racially gerrymandered to undercut Black voting strength). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:11 am
While there, he litigated, NAACP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
The case was eventually appealed to the United States Supreme Court which found in Burton v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
His discussion of NAACP v. [read post]
