Search for: "NIXON v. ROBERTS" Results 361 - 380 of 432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).David BernsteinIn this symposium, my designated task was to review and discuss Part V of Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024) This Part delves into social and economic legislation during the Taft Court era. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
Over the new year, Congress overrode President Trump’s veto to enact into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal 2021—an annual piece of legislation that lays out the budget, expenditures and policies of the Pentagon for the upcoming year. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
The Roberts Court has ruled against tribal interests on numerous occasions, although admittedly the language and tenor of the decision last year in Michigan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
“Before Virus Outbreak, a Cascade of Warnings Went Unheeded,” declared the New York Times headline. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm by Bernie Burk
To my astonishment, they were in the midst of a detailed discussion of the Russia investigations being conducted by the special counsel, Robert S. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Roberts Jr. succeeded Chief Justice William H. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
I first heard talk of changing Rule XXII, which required 67 votes to invoke cloture to end a filibuster, to require only 60 votes instead, while I was working at the Nixon White House, but this rule change was not finally accomplished until 1975 after Nixon had departed. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
” However, Cannon appeared troubled by the “limitless” nature of the appropriations, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
He named Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in that case. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am by Bob Bauer
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am by Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
I argued earlier this month that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report misapplied the presidential clear statement rule and improperly exposed many of President Trump’s actions in response to the Russia investigation to potential criminal liability. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
  On May 2007, the Trump administration agreed to appoint Robert S. [read post]