Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
On appeal, the Secretary of Labor and the SEC both filed amicus briefs urging the Court of Appeals to agree that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) covers Lawson and Zang. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am by admin
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:42 pm by William McGrath
Koss to reimburse Koss $242,419 in cash and 160,000 of options pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by David Rodman
In addition to state standards and Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) requirements, the major U.S. stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Kirstin Dvorchak
In addition to state standards and Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) requirements, the major U.S. stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
By a 3-2 vote on a major case, the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB) has limited the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) whistleblower protection outside the boundaries of the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm by Lindsey Williams
”I quote that final line because of a December 15, 2011 Court of Appeals decision from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, styled “DeGuelle v. [read post]