Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
On appeal, the Secretary of Labor and the SEC both filed amicus briefs urging the Court of Appeals to agree that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) covers Lawson and Zang. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:37 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:35 am
In a March 31, 2010 Memorandum and Order (also available at Lawson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
Lawson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:26 am
SEC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:42 pm
Koss to reimburse Koss $242,419 in cash and 160,000 of options pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Peter V. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Koss to reimburse Koss $242,419 in cash and 160,000 of options pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Mr. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
In addition to state standards and Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) requirements, the major U.S. stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
In addition to state standards and Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) requirements, the major U.S. stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
By a 3-2 vote on a major case, the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB) has limited the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) whistleblower protection outside the boundaries of the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:15 pm
In Sylvester v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
”I quote that final line because of a December 15, 2011 Court of Appeals decision from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, styled “DeGuelle v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:05 am
See Whistleblower 14106-10W v. [read post]