Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 3:44 am
A person in receipt of IS is deemed to have no income and capital for HB purposes (Schs 4 & 5, HB Regs 2006; R v Housing Benefit Review Board of Penwith DC ex p Menear (1991) 24 HLR 115; R v South Ribble Borough Council ex p Hamilton (2000) 33 HLR 104). [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
But then there was Earle v Charalambous (2006) EWCA Civ 1090. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
But then there was Earle v Charalambous (2006) EWCA Civ 1090. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Guest Blogger: Evan P. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:00 am
When asked whether the house number 798 was even or odd, the poll worker responded: A. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
Defense Attorney: Gary P. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
(p. 185). [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm
Z & Anor, R (on the application of) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) (2020) UKSC 40 The issue of the application of the Equality Act to local authority nomination agreements with housing charities reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 12:38 pm
Johnson, 116 Nev. 78, 993 P.2d 44 (2000). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:58 pm
Look at this: Kenneth Zeran, plaintiff in Zeran v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 12:52 am
In its opinion in Cragle v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
That is a necessary consequence of the observations of Lord Hope of Craighead at p 997 (p 963) paragraph 16 of his opinion in McDonald v HM Advocate [2008] UKPC 46 It follows from that that, in any appeal for which leave might be granted by us, the appellant would seek to canvass exactly the same issues as were canvassed in the course of his appeal under s 106 of the 1995 Act, but this time before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:00 am
On April 26, 2011, the Court of Appeals decided Licavoli v Licavoli, No 295901. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
I would agree with Mr Westgate that, since the creation of a statutory right of appeal to the county court, recourse to the highly restrictive approach adopted 30 years ago in the Puhlhofer case (R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, Ex p Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484) is no longer necessary or appropriate. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:18 am
In Roberts, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit after unknowingly purchasing a termite-infested house from the defendants-appellants. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 256 P.3d 801 [Kansas Supreme Court 2011])State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
Robert P. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P (2015) The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:48 pm
EPA filed an administrative complaint against Petitioner John P. [read post]
