Search for: "P. v. Stark"
Results 361 - 380
of 442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
The panel quotes De Canas v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Chief among these are Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statue which require a hospital apply a Fair Market Value (FMV) standard when valuing physician practices and establishing physician compensation [20]. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Chief among these are Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statue which require a hospital apply a Fair Market Value (FMV) standard when valuing physician practices and establishing physician compensation [20]. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
The October edition of the Health Lawyers News, a publication of the American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA), contains an article I co-authored with Jud DeLoss, a principal in the law firm of Gray Plant Mooty, who blogs at Minnesota Health IT. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 9:20 am
In Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Bill 1X 26; see also Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at the circumstances at the company that led to this enforcement action and reviews the important lessons that can be learned from what happened. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am
Statutory torts of privacy have been introduced in four provinces of Canada (Privacy Act 1996 RSBC c 373 (British Columbia), Privacy Act CCSM s P125 (Manitoba), Privacy Act 1978 PSS c P-24 (Saskatchewan), Privacy Act 1990 RSNL c P-22 (Newfoundland and Labrador)). [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
J. 363, 368 (2021). [8] Neiman Marcus v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm
(p.81)We’re not talking here about how the other half lives. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Leonard P. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Hensley v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
As a result, the Draft Article is in stark violation of the principles enshrined in both EU and WTO law. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
(Ibid., p. 4).The Executive Summary follows below, along with the table of contents. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
On 3 May 2018 Sir James Munby P gave directions in the case of Re Venables [2018] EWHC 1037 (Fam) (see above). [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Food Control, 131, p.108415. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Seven to zero is pretty stark, even with the relatively small sample size. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
This is a stark difference from Odom v. [read post]
