Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY"
Results 361 - 380
of 587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
., v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 6:03 am
From the motion for a temporary restraining order in Blue State Refugees v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 6:03 am
From the motion for a temporary restraining order in Blue State Refugees v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 8:01 am
Now, when an officer sneaks up to a car at night or at some other time when it is parked and is not being used by the owner and installs a GPS device, there would not seem to be any particular interference with the owner's possession and use of the property. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
The First District recently brought further clarity to the baseline setting rules in such contexts, as well as the public trust doctrine, in its published opinion in Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:09 am
Lincoln Park is a woman who was injured while crossing a public highway that was operated by the defendant. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:20 am
State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Displayed on a post in Ten Percent’s parking lot was a 3-foot by 2-foot three-dimensional metal sign shaped like a revolver, hung approximately 9 feet off the ground. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
The Sixth Circuit in Cuno v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
" IDX Systems Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
It does not allege that they trespass on the synagogue's private property such as their parking lot or the area of grass and trees behind the sidewalk. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
"From TM v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am
Trustee v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
Businesses are developing a compliance culture, while citizens are becoming more aware of their rights. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
In Kahl v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
Texas argued that as government property, the state has the right to control the language on the plates, and citizens have the right to display (or not display) the vanity plates. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 am
It is settled law that the First Amendment does not give citizens the right to exercise free speech rights on any government property at any time. [read post]
