Search for: "Page v. Principe" Results 361 - 380 of 1,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[iv] If there is no direct evidence of such an agreement, plaintiffs must show there was parallel action—where the defendants all acted in unison and the behavior “would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence unaided by an advance understanding among the parties”[v]—and “plus factors” which show collusion. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] But, to contrary appearances, on February 27, 2020, the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) released its Priority Planning Committee’s Strategic Plan (LSO’s Treasurer (“President” in other provinces), Malcolm Mercer, being the Chair of the Committee). [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
Second, there is a series of questions about our principal nation-state adversaries. [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm by Peter Mahler
The Company The above-described scenario played out in a lawsuit captioned Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
Two Commons Committees –the Home Affairs Committee and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – have recently held evidence sessions with government Ministers discussing, among other things, the government’s proposed Online Harms legislation. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
In Section 540F of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Congress directed the Department of Defense to conduct a feasibility study, and to report the findings of that study, on a potential new “alternative military justice system. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
The two-page addendum is titled, "Addendum of cases, 2015–2020, in which this Court called for supplemental briefing or appointed amicus curiae. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
”  Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Noting that a subpoena ad testificandum will be quashed only where the futility of the process to uncover anything legitimate is inevitable or obvious or where the information sought is utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry, the Appellate Division, citing Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d at page 39, said that the party moving to quash bears "the burden of establishing that the subpoena should be [quashed] under such circumstances. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Noting that a subpoena ad testificandum will be quashed only where the futility of the process to uncover anything legitimate is inevitable or obvious or where the information sought is utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry, the Appellate Division, citing Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d at page 39, said that the party moving to quash bears "the burden of establishing that the subpoena should be [quashed] under such circumstances. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:56 pm by Unknown
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released an eleven page report titled, “Adjusting to Alice: USPTO Patent Examination Outcomes After Alice Corp. v. [read post]