Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
Affaire Y v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:23 am
When acting outside of their lawful authority or duties, a peace officer is not in the execution of their duties, as per R v Wilhem, 2014 ONSC 1637 (CanLii) at para. 104. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm
En noviembre, fue asesinada María del Carmen Vázquez, madre buscadora, en Abasolo, Guanajuato. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:27 pm
R. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm
Furthermore, R v Bender stated that an honest mistake on the time and date of the required attendance of the accused can negate the mens rea of the offence. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:30 am
” People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 11:18 pm
Introduction Elite Construction Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
The consequences for those breaching it range from suspension or dismissal of their proceeding to contempt of Court proceedings (Juman v Doucette 2008 SCC 8 at para 29). [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
This was the key question before South Africa's apex court, the Constitutional Court in Villa Crop Protection (Pty) Ltd v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH decided in December 2022. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and… [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:55 am
See GA Res. 56/169, para. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:56 am
“The provisions as to property disposition may not be revoked or modified, unless the court finds the existence of conditions that justify the reopening of a judgment under the laws of this State. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
; see also answer ¶ 156), {**77 Misc 3d at 365}thereby affording them the opportunity to move for summary judgment on the defense or present it at trial (see DeSanctis v Laudeman, 169 AD2d 1026, 1027 [3d Dept 1991] [“although we agree that the issue was properly preserved by defendant, . [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
See, e.g., Danbeck v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
As the Supreme Court has stated, “the circumstances in which a question of law can be extricated from the interpretation process will be rare”: Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:37 am
It is in this context of a shortage of donor sperm that the newly issued Application of Aziz M v Attorney General of Canada is being litigated. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Voters with Facts v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 8:27 am
See State v. [read post]
