Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 11:14 am
Laroe Estates today seized on the narrowest point of agreement among the parties and the United States as amicus curiae to answer the question in the affirmative and return the case to the lower court to perform the critical analysis, all in a compact eight pages-plus-four-lines. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:31 pm
The parties in Murr v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
Because the EEOC’s Sec. 12112(b)(6) claim was not premised on attendance but rather on the employer’s alleged 100-percent healed requirement, the 12-month policy could be considered an impermissible qualification standard and not an essential function, a federal district court in Illinois, denying the company’s motion to dismiss (EEOC v United Parcel Service, Inc, February 11, 2014, Ellis, S). 12-month leave policy. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:20 pm
D34768 (May 1, 2012), the court held that several parcels of land the Village condemned should be treated as a single unit for valuation purposes, and that "unity of use" was established by the property owners because they showed they acquired the parcels in order to put them together to build a CVS store. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm
Pulte Home Corp. v Montgomery County, 2018 WL 6204906 (4th Cir. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:43 am
(City of New York v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
§ 2000e(k) required United Parcel Service to provide pregnant workers (such as the plaintiff, Peggy Young) with light-duty work comparable to the accommodations UPS made for other employees. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
June — same issue as in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
United States, 150 F. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
” Norgart v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
On December 3rd, the Court will hear argument in Young v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm
Lee v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:56 am
Schooner Harbor Ventures v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:53 pm
The analogy to the deed is a good one because United States [patent] claims serve to define the outer limits or boundaries of the invention in the same fashion as the description of land in a deed defines the outer limits of the land monopoly. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:39 pm
The petition of the day is: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
United States Sentencing Commission as “suggest[ing] that habeas might not even be available for ‘probabilistic’ claims. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:49 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:44 am
United States v. [read post]
