Search for: "Paris v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:42 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:08 am
In Goldwater v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:19 pm
In a 1991 case of Carnival Cruise Lines v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:42 am
"]The applicable standard for evaluating whether a change to a registered mark is permissible is found in Paris Glove of Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:30 am
In UNM Rainforest Innovations v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm
(See Paris Adult Theatre I v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:37 am
In Doss, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:34 am
Invista S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 11:51 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
The documents filed by the parties in the appeal proceedings are numbered as follows:A1 Decision Edwards Lifesciences AG v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 7:34 am
Brief Introduction: On July 1, 2024, the Western District of Louisiana ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the case, State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 1:15 pm
He generally welcomed the CJEU’s decision in Merck v Clonmel C-149/22 / Merck v Teva C-119/22, explaining that it has clarified the approach to SPCs for combination pharmaceuticals. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Bailey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Bailey v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 5:17 am
Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
According to the French IP code, M&S was not entitled to demand the cancellation of those goods and services not cited against it by ISMS, and therefore the claims for cancellation should be accepted as far as they apply to those goods and services cited in the infringement claim but rejected for those not so cited.On the validity of CTM 5410998 SIMPLYRecognizing the need to consider the validity of the marks by reference to the average consumer in all EU member states, the court… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 pm
Bandes 413 States of War: Defensive Force Among Nations Guyora Binder 439 TERM PAPER Herring v. [read post]