Search for: "Patrick v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 2,809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Melendez v Renfroe, Driscoll & Foster, LLP  2021 NY Slip Op 31462(U) April 29, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157344/2019 Judge: W. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a major case on the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 9:16 am
Surasak Boonrueang & Colin Reid, Conservation agreements and environmental governance: The role of nongovernmental actors Sandya Nishanthi Gunasekara & Md Saiful Karim, The role of ASEAN and its members in promoting the norm of responsible governance of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction Orla Kelleher, A critical appraisal of Friends of the Irish Environment v Government of Ireland [read post]
” In arguing that the physical loss trigger to coverage had not been met, State Farm relied on the 2001 Illinois Supreme Court’s opinion in Travelers Insurance Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:27 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
C-64/20 UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara, Éire and An tArd-Aighne concerned the role that a Member State’s court has in case this Member State fails to transpose a Directive into national law. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
In the possession claim, Croydon had served a reply to defence stating that it did not rely upon forfeiture as a ground of possession. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am by Neil Wilkof
In support of this position, Hallsworth refers to Star Industrial Company Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor t/a New Star Industrial Company [1976] FSR 256, which stated that-- a purchaser of a mark becomes owner of it only if he becomes at the same time purchaser of the manufactory or the business concerned in the goods to which the mark has been affixed. [read post]