Search for: "People v Case" Results 361 - 380 of 57,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm by Ilya Somin
Culley involves two Alabama cases where the owners of cars were subject to asset forfeitures as a result of the use of the vehicles by other people to conduct illegal drug transactions. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
To understand this it is helpful to go back to Olmstead¹ a case in which the Supreme Court found that state and local government could not unnecessarily segregate those with disabilities from others. [read post]
In this case, while the plaintiffs claimed several damages, it was up to the trial judge to decide what remedies were available. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[3]   Thus, in some cases retirement funds will need to last 20-25 years. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
Unequal land: Towards full recognition of Indigenous people’s religious rights. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
In 2015 we posted “Spiritual influence” and elections in relation to a report in The Times on the Election Court hearing of the challenge to the re-election of Lutfur Rahman as Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets and a subsequent note on the decision in Erlam & Ors v Rahman & Anor [2015] EWHC (QB) 1215. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The Attorney General argues that Crandall and Edwards are distinguishable because the travel restrictions at issue in those cases operated categorically, regardless of the reasons for which people were traveling. [read post]