Search for: "People v Ely"
Results 361 - 376
of 376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2008, 10:07 pm
Supreme Court held in Roe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (IPBiz),Sinorgchem v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 4:28 pm
Maybe Dickie Scruggs is still paying them out of his own funds.-- You may remember that, in Renfroe v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:31 am
And it was he who introduced me to John Hart Ely's Democracy and Distrust, which influenced my view of constitutional law more than any other jurisprudential book I have read.One of the things I expressly remember reading for that class was Justice Harlan's dissent in Wesberry v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
Hearing Impairments SHHH-Self Help for Hard-of-Hearing People 501 Sycamore Waterloo, IA 50703 USA Programs for Children and Youth who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Deaf Services Commission of IA IA Department of Human Rights Lucas State Office Building Des Moines, IA 50 310- 0090 Phone: (515) 281-3164 (V/TTY) E-mail: dhr.dsci@dhr.state.ia.us Web: http://www.state.ia.us. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
The Texas Supreme Court reversed, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
Aff. (1694) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 People ex rel. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Alcon v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
Stephenson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
We have not seen, in any of the Court’s recent opinions, discussion of patents as “monopolies,” along the lines of Justice Douglas’ concurrence in Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 11:50 am
Helen's talk exposed a divide between the IR people and the privacy advocates. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
Yet, in KSR v. [read post]
