Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
Lord Bannatyne’s judgment affirms, for the first time, that Scottish common law recognizes a right to privacy which is on all fours with the right recognised in England and Wales since Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [126]. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
Eleonora Rosati reports that Mr Justice Arnold will become Lord Justice Arnold.Hayleigh Bosher reports that the UK Intelletual Property Office is looking for people with first-hand experience and/or a working knowledge of using the IP enforcement framework to protect their intellectual property to join their working group.Rose Hughes publishes the serve and volley of tennis innovation. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:53 pm
In the first, Tower Hamlets v The Times, the newspaper was ‘ordered’ to publish a summary of the adjudication. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Sales. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
Lord Carnwath agreed [110]. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
” FCC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
In Matal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
My hypothesis for now is that in the early years of CanLII, the coverage was just too thin to generate more than small-but-steady growth in impact, but that by 2011, the collection covered a big enough range of years to be relied upon by more people, and in turn to have more impact on the form of legal decisions. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
As predicted by various commentators giving a preview of the case (including in my previous post), the five Supreme Court judges (Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs) clarified the applicable law, but unanimously dismissed the appeals against the Court of Appeal decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) on the facts. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:22 am
Open justice v parental protectiveness The court considered the matter against the baseline principle of open justice laid down by the House of Lords (then the highest court in the land) in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Pathologizing people’s justifiable anger at having no meaningful access to court is not useful. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
People who have been here for ten years will also say that the court has enabled the Justices to do many things we could not do in the House of Lords. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Has Chavez-Vilchez altered the approach to derivative claims for residence in the UK? [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:05 am
In Matter of W.K. v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:06 pm
Three people were charged under USA law, although Dr Chau was not one of them. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
