Search for: "People v William" Results 361 - 380 of 4,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Williams civil committed as a detained sex offender requiring confinement pursuant to the Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act (SOMTA)(see).Today, the Court of Appeals, in People v Harnett (2011 NY Slip Op 00744 [2/11/11/]) rejected the argument that since a possible consequence of a plea to a sex conviction is a lifetime civil commitment, fundamental fairness requires that the failure to warn a defendant who pleads guilty to a sex offense that he may be subject to… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:51 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
This morning I attended the Supreme Court argument in Teva v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:42 am
He is the author of more than 15 books.The following people will present papers at the conference: Anthony V. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:14 am by Staci Zaretsky
” Jim Tanner, a Williams & Connolly partner who represents Jeremy Lin, is leaving the firm to start his own sports management business, and he’s taking people with him. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:48 am
Court of Appeals upheld the use of 11 person juries in People v. [read post]