Search for: "People v. Barbara"
Results 361 - 380
of 559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
MANN v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
MANN v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:02 pm
Supreme Court ruled that students could not be given “extra points” in admissions decisions on the basis of race); Barbara Grutter, plaintiff in the Grutter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:02 pm
Supreme Court ruled that students could not be given “extra points” in admissions decisions on the basis of race); Barbara Grutter, plaintiff in the Grutter v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:13 am
Justice Stewart said in Gregg v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
(Ricci et al.. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:37 am
" The standard under Franks v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:19 pm
" It's written by Barbara Leonard. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:00 am
v=JCAAkQcyCKs Other links: one and two. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
., federal magistrate judge Barbara Major found that Qualcomm had “intentionally withheld tens of thousands of decisive documents from its opponent in an effort to win this case and gain a strategic business advantage over Broadcom” and that “Qualcomm could not have achieved this goal without some type of assistance or deliberate ignorance from its retained attorneys”. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
Supreme Court case referenced in the Observer editorial is that of McCleskey v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm
Barbara was wearing a seatbelt. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:50 pm
The Mayor of London v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:45 am
The Defendants ought not to be permitted to occupy this area of land indefinitely when they are trespassers notwithstanding the fact that significant numbers of people may support the aims and objects of their protest. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Justice Ginsburg added that a 2009 decision, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
