Search for: "People v. Barnes" Results 361 - 380 of 569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by familoo
Typos, inconsistencies, reference to events or people who had not previously been introduced so nothing made sense, skipping backwards and forwards in the timeline without markers (no, not a flashback, just poorly planned writing). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
Louie, the Court has asked the federal government to weigh in on the constitutionality of Hawaiian laws providing tax exemptions for those classified as “native peoples,” while the issue in Decker v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:37 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court Considers Whether Lab Analysts Should Testify at Trial: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports the Supreme Court Tuesday again considered whether the people who conduct forensic tests for law enforcement must be available for questioning at trial. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 When pasteurization started to become more mainstream early last century, some people were suspicious of the technology. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by admin
” The most familiar example of this comes from the Supreme Court’s 1989 case, Texas v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
” Following Wednesday’s oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm by Steve Hall
On Tuesday, the justices will hear the case of Juan Smith, who was convicted of murdering five people here. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:25 pm by Steve Hall
The people would be dedicated, bright, unsure, unpopular, and fascinating. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am by Kiran Bhat
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am by Sean Wajert
Accufix Research Inst., Inc., 253 F.3d 1180, 1195-96, amended, 273 F.3d 1266 (9th Cir. 2001); Barnes, 161 F.3d at 143-46; Boughton v. [read post]