Search for: "People v. Barnett"
Results 361 - 380
of 554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
RANDY BARNETT: Well, first of all, on Monday, what he said is that it's somehow improper for a group of unelected people, to use his words, to strike down a law that has been passed by a Congress. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
Nevertheless, the principle that the (federal) government cannot force people to buy products from private companies is not necessarily a conservative one. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
Many of the legal academics who ridiculed Randy Barnett’s work on the mandate, and who were relied upon by legal journalists and commentators, thought their schools were advancing viable legal claims in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:44 pm
By the following year, a district court judge had cited Barnett in his opinion striking down health care reform, and Barnett himself had left behind his March 2010 conclusion that the Supreme Court would need to risk its credibility in a politically charged case, Bush v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
(David Bernstein) The Times has a nice front-page profile of Randy Barnett, discussing his role in crafting the challenge to the ACA. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:01 pm
This was before the Court decided Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
Raich and United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
Chief Justice Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
” I am not suggesting that they necessarily have to name these specific people. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Delgado, 692 P.2d 610, 614 (Or. 1984) (striking down total ban on carrying switchblade knives); Barnett v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have played prominent roles in the development of the “New Originalism. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:53 am
(Randy Barnett) In Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am
He argues that just as the Court accepted in Printz and New York v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am
United States (1997) in an opinion by Justice Scalia) and the state judiciary (in Alden v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
(Randy Barnett) I recently finished reading Pauline Maier’s marvelous book, Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
Forcing people to mediate is not a solution: the participants must want to do so. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:55 am
What is fixed cannot be altered except through Article V amendment; and3. [read post]
