Search for: "People v. Brain" Results 361 - 380 of 1,396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 10:38 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
In that case, the court stated: "It appears that once brain death has been determined, by medical diagnosis under Health and Safety Code section 7180 or by judicial determination, no criminal or civil liability will result from disconnecting the life-support devices (see People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:36 am by Brian LaBovick
When that happens you have a case called YUKUMOTO v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
After all, the essence of the defendant’s claim is that his brain was not working in a way that is familiar to most lay people in their day-to-day lives. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
After all, the essence of the defendant’s claim is that his brain was not working in a way that is familiar to most lay people in their day-to-day lives. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
After all, the essence of the defendant’s claim is that his brain was not working in a way that is familiar to most lay people in their day-to-day lives. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:39 am by Dean Freeman
One of the major causes of brain injuries in young people is when they are injured during sports events or while practicing for a sports team. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm by Liisa Speaker
In this case of consolidated appeals, People v Thomas, No. 329448 and People v Gordon, No. 329449, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirms the case against Clifford Thomas but vacates Jasmine Gordon’s conviction and remands for a new trial due to the ineffective assistance of Gordon’s counsel. [read post]