Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 361 - 380
of 52,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
"Which is, I guess, theoretically true -- once the California Supreme Court decides something, barring its reconsideration of this issue, the only thing left is to ask the Legislature to change the law.But I'm fairly sure that the class of people who drive drunk and kill people don't exactly have awesome lobbyists in the California Legislature. [read post]
10 May 2009, 4:24 pm
Case Name: People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:40 am
This was the issue in the recent Supreme Court of British Columbia case Kirkwood v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:02 am
The UK High Court has today issued its judgment in the Vidal-Hall (and others v Google privacy case [2014] EWHC 13 (QB) The case could have significant impact on Google and other browsers and will be welcomed by privacy campaigners as reining in the wide scope to which Google and others put people's browsing data to use. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:48 pm
In the case of Marley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:34 am
In the case of Hibshman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:49 pm
*** Mariah Lopez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:41 pm
Plus my posts yesterday dragged on forever; sorry about that.So I decided to go back and comment briefly on a case from several months ago that was in a different genre than the recent cases I've discussed. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 2:30 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 5:40 am
A new "John Doe" case named Arista v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
I like Justice Huffman's opinion in this case. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
Appellant now appeals his conviction.STATEMENT OF FACTSRespondent adopts and incorporates herein by reference the Statement of the Case as set forth in the Clerk's Transcript [CT] and the Transcript of Proceedings [TP]. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 5:59 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:33 am
He says he should get custody credit too; it makes no sense to treat people who make bail but are then released and confined to their home any different than people who can't make bail but are then released and confined to their home.And the Court of Appeal agrees with him.Mind you, for Gerson himself, this only knocks a couple of years off his nearly 34-year sentence.But still, it's an important decision overall. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Over the weekend I wrote about Lodi v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm
In the case of People v Scott, 63 NY2d 518 [1984], the criminal court held that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Meuser v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
Case citation: Laake v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am
’s arsenal of legal weapons: designating the Russian-backed separatist forces, the Donetsk People’s Militia and the Luhansk People’s Militia (collectively known as the Donbas People’s Militia) and their leaders, as foreign terrorist organizations (FTO) under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as amended (codified at 8 U.S.C. [read post]
