Search for: "People v. Cope"
Results 361 - 380
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
How are courts coping with “tidal wave” of defamation litigation? [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:46 pm
Vázquez-Salceda et al. (2008). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:30 am
ACAS will need to be properly funded in order to cope with the vast amount of work that would be generated from this. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:03 pm
[v]. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
Hussain v London Borough of Hounslow [2010] EW Misc 15 (CC) (01 December 2010) Not sure why this one wasn’t written up in November. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:28 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 10:05 am
The article suggests humanists cannot cope with data. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 8:28 am
Thus, in reaction to Furman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
Some people also develop heel spurs, bony growths in the heel that cause chronic or long-lasting foot pain. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
If you are (i) seriously interested in regularly writing for a blog of good standing and high standards, (ii) thick-skinned enough to cope with criticism from readers and colleagues, (iii) very competent in terms of literacy, (iv) closely enough involved in patent dispute resolution to have something to say on a frequent basis and (v) based in a major patent litigating jurisdiction other than the United Kingdom, please email Jeremy here (subject line "PatLit")… [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:13 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
How tough, however, has now been answered in the First Department's decision in People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:34 am
Some people also develop heel spurs, bony growths in the heel that cause chronic or long-lasting foot pain. [read post]
