Search for: "People v. Dutch" Results 361 - 380 of 446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2010, 9:27 am by Bartolus
The case reached the Dutch Council of State, which then referred a number of questions to the Court of Justice. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:32 am by Ryan Singel
Anonymous members have adopted the Guy Fawkes masks made famous in the movie V for Vendetta as their own. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
 This is because the blog has suffered a mass sign-up by people with names like xjhfds.fjkljkls and klfgflk.kgrojldf, who appear to be exercising a malign influence over the blog's group email services. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am by Andres
The case is that of Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
  I understand how different people may reach a different conclusion, but I can't see how that becomes a cause of action. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
Royal Dutch Petroleum (issued today by a 2nd Circuit panel of Judge Cabranes writing for himself and Judge Wood, and a concurrence in the judgment by Judge Leval). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
by Kenneth Anderson I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(This is the classic nuisance case of Spur Industries v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm by Paul Jacobson
What most people don't realise is that this general rule doesn't apply to minors, that is children or people under the age of 18. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 9:02 am by Paul
Well, for the most part … What most people don’t realise is that this general rule doesn’t apply to minors, that is children or people under the age of 18. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm by Sheppard Mullin
However, there have been some strides in copyright protection for perfumes in other countries, as evidenced by the Dutch case Lancôme v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:00 am by Adam Wagner
” 21 July | Frans Cornelis Adrianus VAN ANRAAT v the Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights) A man was prosecuted for supplying thiodiglycol (mustard gas) to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by Martin George
Dutch Supreme Court Refers Questions on Article 5(3) Brussels I Regulation Hoge Raad, 4 April 2008, Zuid-Chemie/Philippo’s Mineralenfabriek Nr. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 10:02 am by David Post
[The 1974 final, Holland v. [read post]