Search for: "People v. English"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Subjecting any of these dedicated people to rudeness, incivility, prolix or overly prolific communications, or outright bad behaviour is absolutely unacceptable. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
R. v Butler, 2017 CanLII 86418 (NL PC) [19] There can be coincidental meetings of people, especially in small towns: see for example R. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
While it was apparent that English was not appellant's native language, Officer McComb spoke to him in English, and appellant appeared to understand. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
English v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1615, 1619 (2021) (Sotomayor, J.); Barton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:56 am
Tinker v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm
Today, I discuss the seminal California Supreme Court premises liability case of Rowland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:13 am
However, the California Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
In other words, it is not the state that is the nation (“Quebec is a nation”), but the people. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
The UK QB ruled unanimously (3-0) this fine English morning that the Tory gov’t cannot use the Crown’s prerogative to initiate the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am
I have a few thoughts about Chancellor Chandler's opinion in eBay v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
In the case of Ion Cârstea v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
” (Compare Craig v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April… [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:14 am
(NCA –v- Baker and Others [2020] EWHC 822 (Admin)). [read post]
