Search for: "People v. Holmes" Results 361 - 380 of 760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:55 am by Jon Hyman
Classifying people by sexual orientation is different than classifying them by sex. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Now that people have died, we'll see litigation surrounding this. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Yesterday, Samantha Barbas present on her book, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874-1932 2 v. (1942) Holmes, Oliver Wendell; Pollock, Frederick; Howe, Mark De Wolfe (Editor). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:57 am
When people have wised up to this, the Court has concocted a new metaphor and eased an old one from the scene. [read post]