Search for: "People v. Justice"
Results 361 - 380
of 25,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
(See People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
In Duryea v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
To be sure, as Justice Thomas’s opinion for the Court a few years ago in Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
In Andre Peoples v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 1:30 pm
Rees and Clossip v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:59 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion for the court in Terry v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
It may well be that the justices were disgusted by the defendant -- understandably so -- and were repulsed that he was able to rape someone through the use of his religious authority. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:50 pm
This is amongst the plethora of reasons why it's so nice to read an opinion by Justice Bedsworth. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
Justice Baxters says this appeal "may not be the last," but I can add to that: It definitely won't be the last.It's a death penalty case. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am
On Thursday, we told you about Justice Scalia’s decision in American Express v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
I suppose the initial audience is people who asked me questions at these sessions. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
And it's not "justice". [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Only the people can save the left.And that is Justice Ginsburg’s parting gift. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
People v Kelly Court Discusses a Defendant’s Confrontation Rights Regarding Breathalyzer Machines The Defendant was arrested of driving under the influence after the arresting officer observed his erratic behavior including swerving and nearly striking the traffic delineators. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm
” People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:51 am
Including but not limited to the opening line of Justice Richman's opinion, in which he says: "We see, yet again, the tragic consequences that can result from the mixture of boating and alcoholâ€â [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
The sitting justices, by all indications, are people with integrity who sincerely render decisions in accordance with their good faith reading of the law. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 1:01 pm
Fortunately, you've got plenty of people -- both in and outside of chambers -- to review the thing before it gets published forever in the California Appellate Reports.So Justice Rubin might want to take a quick look at the following sentence on page 7:"Bell filed a habeas corpus petition with the trial court contending that his sentence of 54 years to file amounted to cruel and unusual punishment because it was a defector sentence of life without parole. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
On February 24, 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall issued the Supreme Court’s decision in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:45 pm
But you should read it even before I do.This is the "kangaroo court" case, which I previously discussed here and here, in which Judge Saiers seemed to call the California Court of Appeal a kangaroo court, and to which Justice Sims responded with a hearty bench slap.But now the opinion gets amended to -- largely -- take out the slams on Judge Saiers, in large part because the Court of Appeal accepts the word of the San Joaquin District Attorney, who writes a pretty persuasive… [read post]
