Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 361 - 380
of 729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
Lord Reed adds a further category of persons to whom a “less stringent approach” to precariousness might be appropriate: people who “might be under a reasonable misapprehension as to their ability to maintain a family life in the UK”. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
In Salazar v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
In short, there were two different legs of the call with different information as “contents” and different people as “parties” to the communication. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Riley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm
Contrast Sawyer with the Michigan Supreme Court's decision from this May in People v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:21 pm
People violate terms of service of websites they access every day. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am
And the 6th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:47 pm
See State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:12 am
Butaro NASSAU COUNTYCriminal PracticeDespite Title of Appearance Ticket, DAT Sufficiently Met the Requirement of Accusatory Instrument People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Baker v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
Most Volokh readers know that, and the Fifth Circuit holds (following Smith v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am
For Lord Kerr, it was an indispensable prerequisite that there must be some means of ascertaining the reason that the right to legal assistance has been waived [53]. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
A Petition entitled “Exploiting People in the Public Eye” has been launched demanding new and stricter laws to safeguard people in the public eye and has attracted over 150,000 signatures. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:15 pm
Fortunately, reason has prevailed: In a decision handed down Thursday, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court in People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:42 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:21 am
The question raised in Smith v. [read post]
