Search for: "People v. Novo" Results 361 - 380 of 544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The ACLU will continue to work with Congress to stop the government's spying on innocent people as well as force disclosure about how these programs are used and the secret court rulings that support them. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fair use is a mixed question of law and fact, reviewed de novo. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am by John Elwood
  (Some people might jump to conclusions seeing a state-on-top habeas case relisted for a seventh time, but not us.) [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:11 am by Susan Brenner
U better watch how the fuck you talk to people. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm by Tracy Coenen
Although Judge Sammartino quoted Penal Code section 327 and cited to the California case People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  Moore hadn’t, and so he claimed entitlement to a de novo resentencing. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Susan Brenner
The Appellate Division also noted that it reviews a judge’s denial of a motion for acquittal under a de novo standard, i.e., as if it were writing on a clean slate. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Kelly said, "It's one thing when people sell their blood for money; it's another when they sell their drugs, especially when the diversion compromises the pharmaceutical supply with tainted and outdated drugs. [read post]