Search for: "People v. Perry"
Results 361 - 380
of 783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Perry, which declined to rule on a California initiative banning gay marriage because the parties lacked standing. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Perry, which declined to rule on a California initiative banning gay marriage because the parties lacked standing. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:12 am
Perry, Bonezzi Switzer Polito & Hupp Co. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
In 1971, in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Boggerty v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 11:17 am
These sites were changing their layout, or in some cases even going offline, to protest the Communications Decency Act, signed on February 8 by President Bill Clinton as Title V of the landmark Telecommunication Act. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
Perry, docket 12-144). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Perry, 2020 WL 1275221 (C.D. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:06 pm
Wainwright (the 1963 decision requiring that poor people be represented by counsel when charged with serious crimes) and Mapp v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
Board of Freeholders, No. 10-945, asks whether people arrested and held for minor offenses may be routinely strip-searched.The court will also consider, in Maples v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
It is therefore unlikely that a defeat in Perry v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Oct. 20, 2020) and Carmen John Perri v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court, in Perry v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:42 am
District Court, Central District of California (EEOC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Coyote] Business resistance aims for the moment at (deliberately abbreviated) public comment period [Sean Higgins, Washington Examiner] “Can Obama Really Raise Wages for Millions of People So Easily? [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 pm
LUV organizers seek to lobby the state legislature to approve a "marriage protection amendment" that would give voters opportunity to overturn Varnum v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:49 pm
Both a new study on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony and a case the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear in November on the subject, Perry v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:20 am
Our legislature has thus caught up with the 2013 ruling and result in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
