Search for: "People v. Powell"
Results 361 - 380
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
The main briefs suggest the disconnect between the changing situation on the ground and the way that people within the High Court's jurisprudential bubble continue to operate--in the manner of charming d [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Cal.) in Frankel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Professor Adrian Vermeule agrees with the 1920 progressive consensus that courts should not interfere when legislatures adopt policies that reasonable people think pursue the public good. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
Just last term, in Timbs v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Press Complaints Commission: Claris Powell v The Sunday Telegraph . [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
ANTHONY POWELL, Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
” People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
The respondent’s name in the first case nicely captures most people’s instinctive reaction upon discussing AEDPA: Ryan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:49 am
Powell, Jr. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:22 am
In Payne v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
The Memorandum, and Justice Powell’s subsequent majority opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
Powel (K.B. 1682) ("Thou canst not read a declaration. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 4:43 am
As reported by my colleague Michael Powell, even the word “women” has become verboten. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
Powell, 94 Fla. 550, 556, 114 So. 375, 378 (1927) (holding that, where a contract for legal services fails to expressly provide for the amount of the fee, a “reasonable” fee is implied); McGill v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
FEC and Austin v. [read post]
