Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 361 - 380
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
He began by describing modern democratic government as: government of the people by the people for the people. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 1:00 pm
Related Cases: Epic Games v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:53 pm
” Ellingham v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:04 am
Byrd v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 9:00 am
A 5-4 majority in Apple v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Key Surveillance Powers Involving Electronic Data Chapter IV of the draft, which deals with criminal procedural measures, creates a wide range of government powers to monitor and access people’s digital systems and data, focusing mainly on “subscriber data,” “traffic data,” and “content data. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
In King v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
On Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Garland v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Creating Indigenous Property: Power, Rights, and Relationships. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Indeed, we should ticket people for violating these rules more than we do, IMHO.But what about using your smartphone to surf the internet? [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
DuBois’ Black Reconstruction reminds us that there are books on Reconstruction by and for white people and books on Reconstruction by and for black people. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
” The gerrymanders “debased and dishonored our democracy, turning upside-down the core American idea that all governmental power derives from the people. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
In Moore v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Dawson v Steager, 586 U. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 7:40 pm
United States, to Seila Law v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Occasionally, there have been calls for businesses to simply not deal with certain people at the outset—consider Castaneda v. [read post]
