Search for: "People v. Scott" Results 361 - 380 of 2,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 7:24 am
This issue of citizenship which challenged free black men in their pursuit to procure patent rights was decided by the Supreme Court in 1857 with Justice Taney’s opinion in Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
Maybe conservative activists have no burning desire to overrule Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
Houdyshell (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; Taxation) Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm by George M. Wallace
[Defendant] Mark Bennett continues to maintain and update a thorough compendium of links to Rakofsky-related posts on his blog, Defending People. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:00 am by Rumpole
McNeely on the issue of warrantless blood draws in DUI arrests; andMaryland v King on the issue of whether the state may draw blood for DNA analysis on people who are arrested and charged with felonies. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Importantly, the panel deciding Oscar Pistorius’s legal fate is not a jury comprised of lay people who might be erroneously influenced by evidence which is not before the court, but a Judge and two legally-trained assessors. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:22 am by INFORRM
Open justice v parental protectiveness The court considered the matter against the baseline principle of open justice laid down by the House of Lords (then the highest court in the land) in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:15 am
Given such widespread opposition to the ruling, a book criticizing Kelo may seem no more necessary than a book criticizing Dred Scott or Buck v. [read post]