Search for: "People v. Towns" Results 361 - 380 of 2,641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2021, 3:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Earlier this week, I posted a draft of my article, The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
  Or maybe the defendant confesses, or the victim recants, or there's physical evidence that the defendant wasn't even in town on the day of the alleged crime. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Analyzing the key rules as well as the approach taken towards confidentiality and privacy in arbitration, Lusungu Mtonga, University of Cape Town. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am by Andrew Delaney
The development company that built the road sued the town and the trial court ultimately dismissed the complaint. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:38 am by SHG
Neither this town or its laws may abridge or eliminate Ms. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]