Search for: "People v. Weed" Results 361 - 380 of 456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2010, 9:27 am by Bartolus
Don't be mistaken, you don't go to such coffee shops to sip a latte because their main activities are the sale and consumption of weed. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This ought to assist in weeding out claims which have no real substance. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
  Let's further say that you're thinking about having a friend send you a huge package of weed from California in the mail.Let me give you a piece of advice in such settings. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:25 pm by Rick
  Now comes section 11301 which (I’ve said this all before) supersedes the laws implemented by the CUA and MMPA because it is an initiative of the people (thus not susceptible to being struck down as a portion of the MMPA was in People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
Australian Patentology blog is running a survey too, seeking opinions as to whether -- and if so to what extent -- people believe software patents should be granted. [read post]