Search for: "Perry v. State of California"
Results 361 - 380
of 786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm
” Writing for the majority in Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
08/18/2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA REBECCA HOWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Perry this morning (see Marriage Equality Returns to California), California is included among those states. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:24 am
Honest question, how much do you think that Justice Kennedy would pay to have California pass a constitutional amendment in 2010 before Perry v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Situating the Court’s recent decision in Perry v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 11:40 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm
” The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER), the sole sponsor of Perry v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In a similar case, California refused to place the name of a 27-year-old presidential candidate on its primary election ballot, and the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
In a similar case, California refused to place the name of a 27-year-old presidential candidate on its primary election ballot, and the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:20 am
In Perry, on the other hand, a ruling for plaintiffs would require at least California once again to marry same-sex couples. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am
Perry – constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage; also, question of standing to appeal Wednesday, March 27: 12-307 — United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:09 pm
The Circuit Court disclosed the plan to release the order in this e-mail to news organizations: “Editors, Reporters: “This is to inform you that a filing is expected on Tuesday, June 5, 2012, at approximately 10 a.m., in Perry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:48 am
Like those other decisions (as well as Perry v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Perry, which involved an amendment to the California Constitution, voted on by citizens of California directly through the state’s referendum system, banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
