Search for: "Person v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 361 - 378 of 378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 06-3292, 2007 WL 2385128, at *1 (C.D.Ill. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
Barbara DeBusscher was injured when a portable basketball goal fell on her while she was shopping in a Sam's Club store operated by a subsidiary of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 141 F.3d 1453, 1456 (11th Cir.1998) (emphasis added).Due to the overall similarity between the standards, this Court in Reis found "no appreciable difference in applying the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in [ Burlington ] and the standard articulated by the Eleventh Circuit in Doe. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
The judge said that Wal-Mart's plan, which requires that non-custodial stepchildren live with Wal-Mart employees at least nine months out of the year and that they be claimed on their parents' federal tax returns as dependents to qualify for coverage, runs counter to New York law. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Small Firm's Lawyers Not Waiting for Wal-Mart Fees The Recorder The $172 million Wal-Mart meal-break verdict won by The Furth Firm in 2005 ranks among the top 10 verdicts nationally, but few of the lawyers will be around to celebrate if and when the money arrives. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Anybody can go down to the hardware store and buy a lawnmower for any reason (or no reason) at all. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 7:51 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2:05cv301, Magistrate Judge Love was presented (in the context of a motion in limine asking to exclude evidence of what of the plaintiff's medical bills were "written off" by Medicare or Medicaid (the opinion isn't clear which applies in this case, and the issue would apply to private health insurance as well). [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
After finding that the lead persons did not possess the authority to "assign" under the Act, the Board then found that the lead persons responsibly directed their line or crew members. [read post]