Search for: "Plaintiff 1 et al v. Wells et al" Results 361 - 380 of 1,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 10:25 am by Louis M. Solomon
CDII Trading, Inc., et al., 11 Civ. 2499 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)(DLC), provides a good synopsis of the law and practice of the federal courts on compelling non-signatories to arbitrate. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:43 am by Steven Boutwell
Huntington Ingalls, Inc., et al, No. 17-30523, __ F.3d __ (5th Cir. 1/11/18) was one of first impression for the court. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm by Mark Litwak
§ 101 et seq. as well as common law breach of contract claims against Defendants Steven Spielberg; DW Studios, LLC; Paramount Pictures Corporation; Viacom, Inc.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Universal Pictures Company, Inc.; Universal City Studios, LLP; United International Pictures, B.V.; and Does 1-10,[1] alleging that the motion picture Disturbia — a film produced by Spielberg, owner of DW Studios, LLC, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Paramount… [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:29 am by Broc Romanek
Templeton et al, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that grants of restricted stock units, or RSUs, to directors of Citrix Systems, Inc. were subject to an entire fairness standard of review. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am by Richard Hunt
Castro et al,  2:16-CV-00658-MCE-DB, 2018 WL 2329249, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 8:31 am by Steven Cohen
Missouri Baptist Hospital of Sullivan et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – January 12th, 2018) involves a medical malpractice claim. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
,Plaintiffs and Respondents,v.CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENTOF CORRECTIONS ANDREHABILITATION et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Kali Borkoski
Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831 [3] I have found it impossible to articulate a helpful overview of this trial. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Administrator
Arash Missaghi, et al., 2024 ONSC 3179 [1] This was a motion by the Defendants, Valiollah Onsori-Saisan and Skymark Capital Corporation (“moving parties”), to set aside a Mareva injunction originally obtained on a motion without notice (ex parte motion). [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
FRCP 23(a)(1) requires, as a prerequisite to class treatment, that the plaintiffs be "so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. [read post]