Search for: "Plaintiffs" Results 361 - 380 of 203,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 11:00 pm
CHECKS REFLECTED THAT THE DISPUTED INVOICE HAD BEEN FULLY PAIDIn a commercial claims case brought in the Kings County Civil Court, CEH&AC alleged that it was owed money for heating system services provided to MRE&P.While the plaintiff alleged that some $2,203.94 was due, after a hearing (and a review of the defendant’s payment receipts), the judge ended up dismissing the case.On appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, noted that the defendant’s check memos… [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Reed Shaw
In a 2-1 ruling, the appeals court rejected the plaintiffs’ two primary claims. [read post]
19 May 2024, 7:00 am by Gonzalo E. Mon
For others, this case still serves as a good reminder green claims are being scrutinized closely by competitors (as well as regulators and plaintiffs’ attorneys). [read post]
The plaintiffs emphasized the urgency of the matter, noting that the deployment was scheduled for May 23. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he lengthy delay, in and of itself, is a prima facie showing that plaintiffs failed to exercise reasonable diligence in serving defendant, shifting the burden to plaintiffs to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay” Ollins v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 3:47 am by Finch McCranie, LLP
  Here, we will outline the legal process of pursuing a medical injury claim from a lawyer’s perspective, providing insight into what plaintiffs can expect and how they can effectively manage their cases. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:54 pm by Howard Friedman
Plaintiffs have also not offered any evidence that the transportation plan has compelled them to affirm or disavow a belief forbidden or required by their religion. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:20 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
Once you find yourself involved in a federal Fair Labor Standards Act lawsuit (whether as a plaintiff or a defendant,) you might imagine an elaborate litigation process with an intensely contested trial. [read post]
Due to this amendment, plaintiffs’ incentive to file suit under BIPA may decrease. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:02 pm by Ellen T. Berge and Christopher L. Boone
Becerra, 878 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2018), the Ninth Circuit held that California’s surcharge law violated the merchant plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights by prohibiting single-sticker pricing, which is the practice of listing the price of a good or service and an additional charge for using a credit card (as either an amount or percentage), for example, listing a price as $10, with a three percent credit card surcharge or $10 plus $0.30 for credit. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:07 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Johns Dental and Galella have negotiated out-of-court settlements with the original 20 AGGA plaintiffs without publicly admitting fault. [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:59 am by Brendan Gilligan
And, as EFF’s brief explains, the Simon plaintiffs do not relinquish this reasonable expectation of privacy in their location information merely because they are on pretrial release—to the contrary, their privacy interests remain substantial. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am by Edward T. Kang
In earlier cases, courts dismissed plaintiffs’ challenges because they found that noncompetes involved de minimis effects on competitions and did not harm the public interest, as shown by the plaintiffs’ failure to show non-competes effects on the market. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am by Maribeth Meluch
Implications of the New Standard for Title VII Plaintiffs As the Supreme Court illustrated in its decision through its recitation of prior cases where plaintiffs lost due to the imposition of the heightened standard previously imposed under Title VII, this new standard may in fact yield more successful plaintiffs. [read post]
” In this case, the plaintiff was a transgender woman denied coverage under the Houston County Sheriff’s Office health insurance plan (a self-insured plan administered by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield) for gender-affirming care prescribed for her gender dysphoria diagnosis. [read post]
17 May 2024, 7:47 am by silverman_admin
The legal team for the plaintiff was able to prove to a jury there was a direct correlation between the exposure and the mechanic’s diagnosis. [read post]