Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth"
Results 361 - 380
of 929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
The 1967, opinion, Ford Motor Credit Company v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Title: Jones v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 2:38 pm
Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Usually this is done by an Act of Parliament giving power to extend its application by Order in Council, in practice only after the Islands have been consulted. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Further, the Court decided McQuiggin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:03 pm
In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:53 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:47 am
Compare that to the $0.00 that Pennsylvania taxpayers have paid so far for the prosecution of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Pennsylvania had its own watershed moment in the decision of Whitewood v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
By retelling the story of the case, called Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Dennis Molinaro, “Section 98: The Trial of Rex v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court held that requiring the Commonwealth to pay for a parent’s expert does not violate the separation of powers doctrine. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
On its true interpretation, Note (iii) did not take away the power of the courts to develop the common law. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am
Essentially, if a case involves interpretation or enforcement of Federal law, which includes the Federal Constitution, the Commonwealth of Virginia has the power to remove the case from state court into Federal Court.On Friday April 22, the Commonwealth of Virginia removed such a case from the Circuit Court for Hanover County to the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 11:38 am
In Miller-Jenkins v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
A good new example is Berg v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
In Mallory v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Surrounded by 5-4 nail-biters, the 3-3-3 split generated by Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
However, in a recent as yet unpublished case from the Court of Appeals for Kentucky, K.H. v Cabinet, issued on December 22, 2011, the Cabinet has run into a limit on their power. [read post]
