Search for: "Precision Medical, Inc."
Results 361 - 380
of 861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 5:54 pm
Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc., petitioned the Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office to institute an inter partes review of a patent owned by Volcano Corporation. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
“[T]hat is precisely what the ADA, generally, and the ‘regarded as’ prong specifically, were designed to prevent. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
This is what precisely arises whenever a comp claim is filed. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm
It was also denied as to the claim that it violated a state personnel records law by refusing to produce all of the employee’s medical and other records (Brown v Bank of America, NA). [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
The pharmaceutical company’s American Medical Systems Inc. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:55 pm
Elekta Inc., No. 2013-1239 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 915 F. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am
Richard-Allan Medical Industries, Inc., 888 F.2d 815 (Fed. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
Wellness Support Network, Inc., 2014 WL 644749, No. 10–cv–04879 (N.D. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:34 am
Michaels Stores, Inc., No. 14-55008, 2014 U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
That’s precisely the point – and the only point. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Shearson/American Express, Inc.: “If a precedent of this Court has direct application in a case, yet appears to rest on reasons rejected in some other line of decisions, the [lower courts] should follow the case which directly controls, leaving to this Court the prerogative of overruling its own decisions. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:48 am
: The court punts on this question and instead writing that: [M]ental processes and abstract ideas (whatever may be the precise definition and relation of those concepts) are excluded from section 101. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
” Just half a year earlier, in Interface Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 11:40 am
The case involved a hip resurfacing system, a Class III medical device. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:01 am
The district court erred by “insisting that the composition of the decision maker groups be precisely the same in every relevant disciplinary decision,” the appeals court found. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
AstenJohnson, Inc., No. 10-36142, 2014 WL 129884 (9th Cir. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:17 am
Daniel Von Hoff, Medical Director of Research and Scientific Medical Officer, McKesson Specialty Health and The US Oncology Network. [read post]
