Search for: "Principle Long Term Care, Inc." Results 361 - 380 of 649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Three of the justices of the Supreme Court of Canada agreed, finding further that the legislation was arbitrary and thus inconsistent with the principles of fundamental justice. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It did not take long for Obamacare’s enemies to fire back. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am by Marty Lederman
  If he were correct that deferred action status grants some sort of “legal presence” to covered aliens and is for that reason not statutorily authorized, that rationale would condemn not only DAPA, but also the entire, long history of deferred-action policies, going back decades. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 10:41 am by Nursing Home Law Center Staff
Source: http://long-term-care.advanceweb.com/Columns/Gerotalk/Study-Finds-Largest-For-Profit-Nursing-Home-Chains-Providing-Lesser-Care.aspx [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:41 am by Pearl Griffin
Source: http://long-term-care.advanceweb.com/Columns/Gerotalk/Study-Finds-Largest-For-Profit-Nursing-Home-Chains-Providing-Lesser-Care.aspx [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
 Here Sir Richard provides the raw material, in terms of a brightly-illustrated full colour 227 paragraph judgment, while Aaron provides the write-up. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If those states are then confronted with additional, arguably unclear requirements they must also satisfy, the terms of the bargain seem to be changed. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
This is a good illustration of some important libel law principles, so I thought I’d write about it. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
The memo repeatedly cites Crowley Caribbean Transp., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Thus, aside from the cases granted out of the Long Conference, the Court appears to be firmly adhering to its practice of relisting cases at least once to perform a “quality check” before granting them. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Statutes specified the penalties for crimes but nearly always gave the sentencing judge wide discretion to decide whether the offender should be incarcerated and for how long, whether he should be fined and how much, and whether some lesser restraint, such as probation, should be imposed instead of imprisonment or fine. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Harris, 13-817, and KBR, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Take courts at their word: consumer mindset/confusion is what we care about. [read post]