Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue" Results 361 - 380 of 837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Once the proposed Regulations are published by the Department of Treasury this year, the public will be able to provide comments on them.1 The Act also applies to entities formed under tribal governments. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
The PTAB invalidated certain claims of the patent as obvious under prior art, but the board’s final decision did not address the merits of SAS Institute’s remaining claims. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Second, the agreements were not boilerplate; they were tailored to each employee and that employee’s position in the company and were based on the amount billed to the client in the prior year or the amount paid to the departing employee in the prior year. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:28 am by Amy Bray
  At some point it is likely that he will have to deal with a lease agreement, whether to secure space or to gain revenue from owned space. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
The other decision was one by the Bombay Bench of the ITAT in Jacobs Engineering v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm by Sarah Tran
With additional 102(e) prior art becoming available per the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, the development of robust search tools is now more important than ever before. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 4:23 am by SHG
The news was big, huge, that the Department of Education under dreaded Betsy DeVos changed everything. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Manahattan Probate Lawyers said the petitioners named and cited as interested parties, in addition to the charitable and non-charitable residuary legatees, the Attorney General of the State of New York (AG), the United States Treasury Department--Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the New York State Tax Commission (Commission). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Rptr. 2d 209, January 31, 2003, Decided and Filed PRIOR HISTORY: APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. [read post]