Search for: "Property Acceptance Corp"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am
Supreme Court decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
Not-for-Profit Corp. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:39 pm
Bhasin, through his business, was an enrollment director for Canadian American Financial Corp. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Properties, LLC, 2019 WL 2424101 (C.D. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
The $9,500 fine levied against Ring Power Corp., which sells and leases industrial machinery, represents a rare penalty for a company found to have violated a 75-year-old ban on campaign contributions from federal contractors. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell discusses last week’s decision in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:48 am
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies have a number of unique properties — they are decentralized, globally accessible, low cost, and safe. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
(It is not, as the Court suggests, about a private property owner that simply opened up its property to others.) [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:09 pm
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
Chromalloy San Diego Corp., B-416990.2 (June 3, 2019) involved a procurement by the Navy to service the LM2500 engine. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:00 am
Fisher sued the U.S. government after the Army Corps did not accept its bid to install barriers along the southern border, a contract potentially worth billions of dollars. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:20 am
The Treasury Department has imposed sanctions on individuals and companies named in foreign hacking indictments, like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)-linked hackers named in the 2016 indictment for distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks against the U.S. financial sector, as well as the GRU operatives named in indictments in 2018. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
“An attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate [*5]cause of a plaintiff’s damages if ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence ‘the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action'” (Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50 [2015], rearg denied 27 NY3d 957 [2016], quoting AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
These are the OEMs with respect to which Judge Koh analyzes Qualcomm's conduct:LG ElectronicsSonySamsungHuaweiMotorolaLenovoBlackBerryCuritelBenQAppleVIVOWistronPegatronZTENokia, andsmaller Chinese OEMs.In numerous cases Qualcomm threatened with a disruption of chipset supplies unless OEMs accepted its patent licensing terms, and there were various agreements under which OEMs paid a higher patent royalty when using third-party modem chips than Qualcomm's products (one example:… [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm
Canadian Broadcasting Corp., there is no hierarchical approach towards rights, and referring to R. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 5:06 am
Corp. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:25 am
Plaintiff Ostrolenk Faber LLP (Ostrolenk), a law firm specializing in intellectual property, brings this action against its former client, Sakar International, Inc. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:00 pm
Brother Int’l Corp., 673 F. [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm
Instead, it makes its money by charging interest on the extension of credit and on fees paid by merchants that accept their cards. [read post]
