Search for: "Quick v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 2,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by Mark Ashton
 The quick answer is that this doctrine was long abandoned in other states but survived in Pennsylvania until this century. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:50 pm
The judge held that the "combination of drugs" method: "resulted in arbitrary abrogation of a statutory and substantive right of a condemned person, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution (due process clause)" See State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
Just a quick comment: I do not believe that the following statement correctly reflects the opinion: "In District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:47 am by Philip Miles
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the United States Supreme Court held that the NLRB needs at least three members to exercise its authority. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am by Steve Bainbridge
But some quick Westlaw research kicked up a seemingly relevant case, which --oddly enough--also comes from Utah; namely, Utah Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
On March 27, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Kisor  v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
On March 27, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Kisor  v. [read post]