Search for: "R. v. R."
Results 361 - 380
of 145,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2019, 6:59 am
Criminal procedure — Writ of actual innocence — Abuse of discretion This is the fourth time this Court has considered challenges to appellant’s convictions relating to the murder of 64-year-old Adeline Wilford, who was stabbed to death in the kitchen of her farmhouse on January 5, 1987.1 In this appeal, David R. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:50 pm
" Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
Coate, FTC discuss UNITED STATES V. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:26 am
Thompson brought claims for negligence against E&R and the ... [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:49 am
Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Broadcast Music Inc. et al v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
The judge applied R(McIntyre) v Gentoo Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 5, where an assured tenant judicially reviewed the Housing Association landlord’s refusal to give consent to exchange homes with another tenant. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:12 am
R (Ghai) v Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (Ramgharia Gurdwara, Hitchin and others intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 59; [2010] WLR (D) 36 “The aims of the provisions of the Cremation Act 1902 were to ensure that cremations were subject to uniform rules throughout the country, to enable the Secretary of State to regulate the manner and places in which cremations were carried out, to require a crematorium to be a building which was appropriately equipped and to ensure that a… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:32 am
R. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:08 am
In the Matter of Michael B. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:46 am
A class action against Babies "R" Us and manufacturers of upscale baby products—BabyBjorns, Britax car seats, Kids Line and Peg Perego products, Maclaren strollers, Medela breast pumps—over allegedly anticompetitive vertical price restraints has resulted in a $35.24 million settlement after the district court certified a class of consumers who purchased particular products from Toys "R" Us or Babies "R" Us since 1999 (and,… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:56 pm
R. was accused of embezzling over $100,000.00 from a former employer. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:42 pm
Contracts — Fraud — Punitive damages Appellant Ricardo R. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:01 pm
At the conclusion of the case, appellee David R. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:54 pm
R. was accused of embezzling $10,000.00 from her former employer. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
R (Limbu and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others; [2008] WLR (D) 304 “It was irrational for the Home Secretary to rely on the discretionary policy relating to settlement entry for Gurkha veterans where discretion could only be exercised in favour of indefinite leave to remain on the basis of restrictive express factors. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161; [2011] WLR (D) 56 “It was contrary to the policy and objects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to impose an obligation on the Secretary of State when refusing an overstayer’s application for leave to remain to make an appealable removal decision at the same time which would confer a right of appeal. [read post]
25 May 2007, 2:27 am
R (Bancoult) v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 am
R (Mirza and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 159; [2011] WLR (D) 55 “The Home Secretary, when refusing to extend a foreign national’s leave to remain in the United Kingdom, ought at the same time or promptly thereafter make a removal decision which, if adverse, would enable the foreign national to appeal without breaking the law by overstaying. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:59 am
No duty of care owed over child support R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
