Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 7:23 am
The case is South Dakota v. [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Lopez (1995) and United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
Roberts and Alito did not agree that there was a Commerce Clause problem with the PBA ban. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Kermit V. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
The decision was also blatantly at odds with the text and original meaning of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1995), the Supreme Court held 5-4 that Congress lacked power under the Indian Commerce Clause of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Randy Barnett and Jeff Rosen have recognized, the Chief Justice’s tax-power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:29 pm
Robert D. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
He favorably quotes Justice Scalia's memorable statement from Bendix Autolite Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:02 am
” [Scott Beyer] All things bright and beautiful/All creatures great and small/All things wise and wonderful/The Commerce Clause reaches ’em all [John-Michael Seibler, Heritage, on Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in Tenth Circuit decision upholding as constitutional federal rules requiring owners to preserve Utah prairie dog habitat on private land; earlier on PETPO v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that in their latest filing, the challengers in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:51 am
" In Lopez and Morrison, Chief Justice Rehnquist (for whom Roberts clerked) cast doubt on the logic of the New Deal era commerce opinions, but would only hold that they could not be extended. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch client Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce offered the following statements today regarding the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of Arizona’s “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” legislation crafted by Pearce to penalize Arizona businesses that knowingly hire illegal aliens (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
The foundation filed cert-stage and merits-stage amicus briefs in support of the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
Chief Justice Roberts announces opinions in Rucho v. [read post]
