Search for: "ROBERTS v. DOJ "
Results 361 - 380
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm
They argue that this divide is exemplified by the the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm
The latest installment in the NSA declassification story comprises five documents. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm
(Josh Blackman, guest-blogging) Nearly everything written about calls for Justice Kagan to recuse in NFIB v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
In my guest-blogging stint, I will try to place NFIB v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm
* The DOJ and a number of state attorneys general are suing to block the merger of American Airlines and US Airways. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:30 pm
Several senators have even called on the DOJ to explore whether employer password demands are coercive. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:11 am
Robert L. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm
Justice Roberts, with whom I rarely find myself in agreement (and would he stop with that smirky smile, already), got this much exactly right in U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
According to the AP, the DOJ letter did not explain why it had sought the telephone records. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Fred Schauer on coverage v. protection; Robert Post on transfers of information that are regulated, like securities law; sexual harassment; antitrust—Eugene Volokh says that antitrust couldn’t be constitutionally applied against Google. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
., Peterson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
Riegel v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
So, too, in 1989 the Court appointed John Roberts, currently the Chief Justice, as amicus to defend the judgment below in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Why did DOJ do this? [read post]
