Search for: "ROBERTS v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 18,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 11:44 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 18-3052, a case challenging the constitutionality of Robert Mueller’s appointment to serve as ‘Special Counsel’ for the Russia investigation. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 10:00 am by Jane Chong
Moscati issued this statement yesterday on developments in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
On April 20, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The bad news for the friends of federalism is that the 4-4 decision was likely the result of Chief Justice Roberts' recusal: It is difficult to believe that Roberts who joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v Oregon, would tolerate state tort claims rooted in the allegation that a manufacturer committed fraud against the FDA. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:37 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Obstructing justice Convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, of two counts of obstructing justice, Robert Carl Chapman presents a single question for our review: Was the evidence sufficient to sustain both of his convictions? [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:30 am by Paul Horwitz
 A few years ago, Jack Balkin wrote about Roberts's opinion in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:15 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Criminal Procedure Request for counsel Robert Allen, Jr., appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to second-degree reckless homicide, contrary to Wis. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]