Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 37,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
The only news coverage that I've found of yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Harbison v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:57 pm by stu@crimapp.com
Today the South Carolina Supreme Court reached essentially the same position in Council v State. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:04 am by Jorge Miranda
On August 27, the United States and Mexico announced having reached a preliminary agreement regarding the terms under which they would conclude bilaterally the renegotiation of the NAFTA. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:26 pm by Myers Freelance
The post Competitive Keyword Advertising Reaches the Legal Field appeared first on Myers Freelance. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:23 pm
A tip of the cyberhat to Kennedy Simpson for passing along to us a new medical device preemption decision in Kentucky state court, Mattingly v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:57 pm by Cassandra Burke Robertson
One case that I suspect will have long-lasting influence is Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Christopher Tyner
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:37 am
In particular, the event will focus on the obligations of States under Articles 74(3) and 83(3) of UNCLOS to refrain from activities that could jeopardise or hamper the reaching of a final agreement on maritime delimitation. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:56 am by Kate Fort
Top Side Principle Briefs Brackeen_Haaland v. [read post]