Search for: "Read v. People"
Results 361 - 380
of 21,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm
Sometimes you read these death penalty cases and wonder what it was that led the jury to invoke the death penalty.Not here.Just read the first nine pages of the opinion, which recounts the various crimes that the defendants committed during two months in 1992, alongside their subsequent escape attempts from prison in 1994.Wow. [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:16 pm
But to even get a glimpse as to why you have to read, and read, and read, and read, and then finally at about page 80 (!) [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:36 am
One of the dangers I learned from reading this opinion is that when you knock off banks, although the police might not know who you are, others in your neighborhood might. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 11:11 am
But I bet you that for the majority of Californians, this opinion has greater practical significance than 99.999% of anything else they'll read in the pages of the California Appellate Reporter.The critical issue is this: Can you use your cell phone at a red light? [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
" See Griswold v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
For people like me, whether that's okay or not probably won't have much of a practical effect at all; it's extremely unlikely to happen. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:16 pm
Fox v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
Fantastic to read. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 2:29 pm
In all honesty, I'm not sure that you should read it. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Read the opinion to see why (and whether you agree). [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:01 pm
That said, the more I read about Ms. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
Gerberding is with a couple of other people, and they've set up a shopping cart with a tarp on it and multiple pallets as their camp. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Though once one reads further in the actual opinion, one discovers yet another interesting fact about Mr. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:45 pm
" Read the instruction, let the jury use its common sense with respect to what this means, and move on.In this case, the trial court -- Michael Knish, a temporary judge in San Bernardino -- didn't do that, and instead gave a lengthy series of examples to the jury about what wouldn't constitute "reasonable" doubt. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:41 am
I spent my morning reading the California Supreme Court's opinion in the marriage cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
Renaissance Learning, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:12 pm
The aspect of the opinion that most caught my eye on the first reading was its resemblance to the iconic Dodge v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:05 pm
Remember Marbury v. [read post]
